Hospital Sends Police Officer to Patient’s Home After Abnormal Test
So, I was reading the decision of the Court in Gonzalez v. Agarwal (decided on 1-23-06 but just recently coming across my desk). Essentially, a woman had been complaining of headaches for over two years. Eventually, she ends up at the ER at St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center because the pain had become so severe. A CT of the head was ordered and the patient was initially told that everything was normal. Well, turns out the CT was not normal. In fact, the test, unfortunately, revealed an inoperable brain stem tumor. So severe was this condition that the hospital sent a police officer to the woman’s house to have her immediately return to the hospital for treatment (which she did). But, what this case underscores is the obligation of a hospital to contact a patient after having an abnormal test performed in the ER. I doubt that it’s the standard of care to send a police officer in all situations, but at least at one NJ hospital, perhaps it is when the condition is potentially life-threatening.
- De Laroche v. Advanced Laparoscopic Association et al. (A-5403-1474) Decided 2/28/2017
- Clarification on the Statute of Limitations for “Survival” Claims – Warren v. Muenzen, 448 N.J. Super. 52, (Super. Ct. App. Div. 2016) December 7, 2016)
- Settling Defendant Charge Need Not Always Be Given – Hernandez v. Chekenian, No. L-11038 14, 2016 WL 6024008, (N.J. Super. Ct. Law Div. July 15, 2016)
- Vascular Surgeon Not Qualified to Testify Against Family Practitioner Who Performed a Vascular Procedure – Afonso v. Bejjani – A-1623-15T4
- Federally Qualified Health Center Entitled to New Jersey’s Cap on Charitable Immunity for Hospitals – S.M. v. United States of America – CA No. 13-5702, USDC – DNJ